Stock across channels
One reconciled position across store, online, and warehouse, so what a customer can buy matches what you actually hold.
Reporting and integration for retailers selling in more than one place: stock that reconciles across channels, daily trading numbers nobody compiles, and supplier orders raised from data rather than memory.
A point of sale, an online store, a warehouse, and an accounting package each hold part of the position. Reconciling them is a person's job, it happens after the fact, and the gap between the two numbers is usually discovered by a customer.
One reconciled position across store, online, and warehouse, so what a customer can buy matches what you actually hold.
Sales by store, channel, and category assembled automatically each day, instead of a spreadsheet somebody builds every morning.
Replenishment raised from actual movement and lead times rather than from a manager's memory of what looked low.
Failed payments, short deliveries, and returns surfaced and routed to an owner, rather than found when the customer follows up.
The online platform, the point of sale, and the finance system connected so a change in one does not require a manual entry in another.
What each line actually earns once landed cost, discount, and channel fees are counted, per product and per place it sells.
A retailer with a store and an online presence is running at least two systems that both believe they know the stock position, plus a warehouse process that knows what physically moved. None of them is wrong. They are simply measuring at different moments.
The reconciliation between them is manual, so it happens on a cadence rather than continuously. In the gap, the website sells something the shelf no longer holds, or the shelf holds something the website says is unavailable.
Purchase orders in a lot of retail operations are raised by someone experienced walking the shelves or scanning a report and deciding what looks low. That judgement is genuinely valuable and it does not scale, and it disappears when that person is on leave.
Raising replenishment from actual movement and supplier lead times keeps the judgement where it matters, on the exceptions and the seasonal calls, rather than spending it on the routine lines that reorder themselves.
Establish where the stock and sales positions diverge today, and what that divergence costs.
Connect the channels and prove the reconciled position against a trading period you already closed.
Move buyers and store managers onto it, then refine around the decisions they make daily.
“The most expensive stock number is the one that is wrong in the direction of a sale you cannot fulfil.”
Yes, and it is normally the first thing worth doing. The channels are connected so one position is maintained rather than two that are compared periodically.
The reporting reads the point of sale and the online platform directly and assembles the daily view automatically, leading with what moved rather than presenting a wall of figures.
Replenishment can be raised from actual movement and lead times, with the exceptions routed to a buyer for a decision. The routine lines stop consuming judgement; the seasonal calls still get it.
Failed payments, short deliveries and returns are surfaced and routed to a named owner as they happen, rather than surfacing later as a customer complaint.
Yes. The integration layer is built around what you already run, including bespoke and on-premise systems, rather than requiring a move to a single platform.
A short discovery call, a working brief the same day, and a fixed price before anything starts. The first conversation is free.
Request a discovery call